- Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Lee Rudolph on Drug researchers trip up, lifting paper that is meth compose one on LSD
We’re on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
Nine years ago this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”
Just just just What happens to be clear into the intervening nine years is really what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what goes on whenever something goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just what happened within the last one year.
Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD
Evidently meth is a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.
Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD could harm vision because they’d lifted most of the paper from articles which had showed up the entire year before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.
The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal damage in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:
Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper
A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after finding a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. Nevertheless the author that is first of paper pressed straight right straight back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.
The content, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been authored by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly photos) the scenario of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that solved after the described combination treatment.
But during the notice explains, the paper can’t be trusted:
Kyoto University suspends author that is first of Kumamoto quake paper
Initial writer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the results of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college position for check my blog starters 12 months.
Intending Lin, of this Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, ended up being sanctioned because of the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism within the 2016 paper:
Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, dangerous and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price
Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: Do you realy enjoy our weekly roundup? If so, we’re able to really make use of your assistance. Could you start thinking about a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Thanks ahead of time.
Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?
Ever wished to hone your talent being a medical sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.
because of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, that is focused on educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a set, Forensics Friday.
Take a good look at the image below, and then simply simply just take our poll. From then on, go through the website website link below to learn the answer that is right.
Cock and bull tale results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper
The ancients possessed thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you obtain the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.
A small grouping of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for wanting to reuse information from a chicken research inside their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.
This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never influence virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.
‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner
A article that is recent provided a stark caution concerning the dangers to young ones of fluoride into the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a brand new paper which undermines the reliability associated with initial information.
The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The very first author on the paper is Christopher Neurath, of this American Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.
The content, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large severity and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back into the mid-1980s.
Based on the scientists:
Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a peer-reviewed log?
Often, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to make an effort to do justice to a current paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a few paragraphs right right here:
Leech paper nets phrase of concern
A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern after having an audience notified the log about possible difficulties with the info.
The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. In line with the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results: